请教一下GnosisSafe多签钱包开发的问题,一下是GnosisSafe的相关代码:
function execTransaction(
address to,
uint256 value,
bytes calldata data,
Enum.Operation operation,
uint256 safeTxGas,
uint256 baseGas,
uint256 gasPrice,
address gasToken,
address payable refundReceiver,
bytes memory signatures
) public payable virtual returns (bool success) {
bytes32 txHash;
// Use scope here to limit variable lifetime and prevent `stack too deep` errors
{
bytes memory txHashData =
encodeTransactionData(
// Transaction info
to,
value,
data,
operation,
safeTxGas,
// Payment info
baseGas,
gasPrice,
gasToken,
refundReceiver,
// Signature info
nonce
);
// Increase nonce and execute transaction.
nonce++;
txHash = keccak256(txHashData);
checkSignatures(txHash, txHashData, signatures);
}
address guard = getGuard();
{
if (guard != address(0)) {
Guard(guard).checkTransaction(
// Transaction info
to,
value,
data,
operation,
safeTxGas,
// Payment info
baseGas,
gasPrice,
gasToken,
refundReceiver,
// Signature info
signatures,
msg.sender
);
}
}
// We require some gas to emit the events (at least 2500) after the execution and some to perform code until the execution (500)
// We also include the 1/64 in the check that is not send along with a call to counteract potential shortings because of EIP-150
require(gasleft() >= ((safeTxGas * 64) / 63).max(safeTxGas + 2500) + 500, "GS010");
// Use scope here to limit variable lifetime and prevent `stack too deep` errors
{
uint256 gasUsed = gasleft();
// If the gasPrice is 0 we assume that nearly all available gas can be used (it is always more than safeTxGas)
// We only substract 2500 (compared to the 3000 before) to ensure that the amount passed is still higher than safeTxGas
success = execute(to, value, data, operation, gasPrice == 0 ? (gasleft() - 2500) : safeTxGas);
gasUsed = gasUsed.sub(gasleft());
// If no safeTxGas and no gasPrice was set (e.g. both are 0), then the internal tx is required to be successful
// This makes it possible to use `estimateGas` without issues, as it searches for the minimum gas where the tx doesn't revert
require(success || safeTxGas != 0 || gasPrice != 0, "GS013");
// We transfer the calculated tx costs to the tx.origin to avoid sending it to intermediate contracts that have made calls
uint256 payment = 0;
if (gasPrice > 0) {
payment = handlePayment(gasUsed, baseGas, gasPrice, gasToken, refundReceiver);
}
if (success) emit ExecutionSuccess(txHash, payment);
else emit ExecutionFailure(txHash, payment);
}
{
if (guard != address(0)) {
Guard(guard).checkAfterExecution(txHash, success);
}
}
}
contract Executor {
function execute(
address to,
uint256 value,
bytes memory data,
Enum.Operation operation,
uint256 txGas
) internal returns (bool success) {
if (operation == Enum.Operation.DelegateCall) {
// solhint-disable-next-line no-inline-assembly
assembly {
success := delegatecall(txGas, to, add(data, 0x20), mload(data), 0, 0)
}
} else {
// solhint-disable-next-line no-inline-assembly
assembly {
success := call(txGas, to, value, add(data, 0x20), mload(data), 0, 0)
}
}
}
}
=========================================================== 上面是GnosisSafe的相关代码,我在开发一个基于GnosisSafe的应用程序,在调用execTransaction 进行转账操作,前面的的验证签名已经通过了,但是在执行execute时发生了错误,提示 GS013 错误,由于execute是嵌入式汇编,没有返回失败的原因,大佬们能帮忙分析一下可能的原因吗?
返回错误: 2024-11-25T09:33:59 | 信息 | 交易将会失败,原因: execution reverted: GS013
GS013 是执行时 Gas 没有设置对, 参考:https://github.com/safe-global/safe-smart-account/blob/a6504a9afdeac186a8cdb29ad68b189523c80eda/docs/safe_tx_gas.md